<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Thoughts of a Seeker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net</link>
	<description>Exploring the important religious questions from a Mormon (LDS) perspective.  Focus on ancient history, early Christianity, and Mormon doctrine/practice.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:21:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nothingness vs. Somethingness by daviddstoker</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/nothingness-vs-somethingness/comment-page-1/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>daviddstoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 02:21:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/?p=92#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Thanks for coming by Greg, happy to let you promote Molly Barker and Girls on the Run; great vision, mission and movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for coming by Greg, happy to let you promote Molly Barker and Girls on the Run; great vision, mission and movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nothingness vs. Somethingness by Greg Ward</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/nothingness-vs-somethingness/comment-page-1/#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Ward</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Nov 2010 20:54:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/?p=92#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Compliment - First and foremost, I truly enjoyed reading your post entitled, &quot;Nothingness vs. Somethingness&quot;. Your thoughts and comparisons opened my eyes to a whole new viewpoint, one of which I never considered in the past. While we were pleased in reading your blog, it really comes as no surprise to me because my wife and I both are open-minded people.

Fear - As parents we are deeply concerned about what the future holds for our children. Browse any teen fashion magazine and/or view all of today&#039;s television programming aimed toward of kids. It&#039;s a sad state of affairs to say the very least, a virtually unobtainable standard for most kids. In my humble opinion, Disney has become the new Hollywood over our lifetime and they better than anyone else set a whole new standard generating profits by inventing stars. Putting kids in television and movies is only the beginning of their giant cash machine. Let&#039;s not forget about the live concerts and world wide merchandising to follow that exists around every corner in every isle of each and every store. These companies are interested in profit, but at what cost? When my wife and I review most of the TV programming, we witness a bunch of seemingly perfect individuals. Hair, make-up, clothing, even the homes portrayed in the shows are larger than life. So where does that leave our children? We feel that it only causes them to feel cheated and deprived.

Parent/ Troop Leaders - We are the proud parents of one marvelous daughter. We had hoped to more than one child but a higher power prevented that from happening. With that we&#039;ve entertained the notion of either adopting or volunteering to help young people. Why? Because we have much to share. In 2003 we adopted an abandoned Girl Scout Brownie Troop. Now going on our eight year, we are still together and four are now pursuing their Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest achievement in Girl Scouting. (But that&#039;s a whole other story). The long and the short of it is, &quot;We are interested in helping to empower young people with confidence, self esteem and to teach them that they&#039;re extraordinary just the way they are. When they&#039;re with us we don&#039;t care about hair, make-up or brand named clothing, only them as a person, as an individual person.

Why do they do it? - Some folks we know wonder how or even why we make the time to give so much of ourselves to other people. I guess you could say it&#039;s a calling of sorts. One thing that also bears mentioning here is this; When I was very young, I was interested in hobbies. Two of our neighbors allowed me to spend countless hours in their own respective workshops teaching me about all of the various materials and how to use the machines safely. Always appreciative, I felt absolutely indebted to them 24 p/day. After several months had passed I made a similar statement to both men respectively, &quot;I don&#039;t know how I&#039;ll ever be able to pay you back for all you&#039;ve done.&quot; Their response was virtually identical, &quot;Son, when you grow up, you go out and help teach young people as well. If you do that, then we&#039;re square&quot;, Okay?&quot; Of course I agreed to the arrangement wholeheartedly. (Interestingly, neither one of these men knew the other).

Nowadays we don&#039;t expect anything in return for our volunteer efforts. We always provide environments where kids feel safe, feel good about themselves and hopefully, become success stories in their own futures. Just the same, we are supporters of anyone else who believes in these same kinds of philosophies. With that a particular name comes to mind right away, &quot;Molly Barker&quot;.

Our one and only daughter participated in Girl&#039;s on the Run (G.O.T.R.). Beginning in my daughter&#039;s 3rd grade year, she joined Girls on the Run. G.O.T.R. is an after school program which takes place a couple of days p/week in the elementary school gym for the most part. http://www.girlsontherun.org/default.html At the time, my wife and I were simply happy that our daughter was getting a little extra exercise and enjoying yet another self-esteem building program. As far as we&#039;re concerned, young people can never get too much positive influence in our world full of make believe.

Several weeks later a local mom later gifted me with Molly Barker&#039;s first book entitled, &quot;Girls on Track&quot;. Link: http://www.girlsontherun.org/mollybarker_sbooks.html#track  Admittedly I am a sensitive person to begin with, so it came as no surprise that many of the stories in Molly&#039;s book brought me to tears. Furthermore, the people that know me well say, &quot;If you liked the book Greg, you MUST go see Molly Barker live.&quot; Later we discovered just how right they were.

My wife and I enjoyed the opportunity to meet Molly Barker for the first time in 2006. The meeting was brief with not much more that a handshake and picture pose during a 5K event. Nevertheless, we recognized a solid connection when looking into in Molly&#039;s eyes that made us realize that we&#039;re both on the very same page. In the days to follow I became deeply inspired to make a fully edited movie about my daughter&#039;s Girls on the Run experience. Later we mailed a copy to Molly and she too was deeply moved. The next year I made a second movie about the program, but this time not just for my daughter&#039;s collection, but all of the team&#039;s families as well. The DVD was very well received. Anymore, in communicating with Molly and her Girls on the Run program, we always refer to our family as being, &quot;3 of her biggest fans&quot;.

 &quot;Girls on the Run is so much fun!&quot; Just ask my daughter and she&#039;ll tell you ALL about it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Compliment &#8211; First and foremost, I truly enjoyed reading your post entitled, &#8220;Nothingness vs. Somethingness&#8221;. Your thoughts and comparisons opened my eyes to a whole new viewpoint, one of which I never considered in the past. While we were pleased in reading your blog, it really comes as no surprise to me because my wife and I both are open-minded people.</p>
<p>Fear &#8211; As parents we are deeply concerned about what the future holds for our children. Browse any teen fashion magazine and/or view all of today&#8217;s television programming aimed toward of kids. It&#8217;s a sad state of affairs to say the very least, a virtually unobtainable standard for most kids. In my humble opinion, Disney has become the new Hollywood over our lifetime and they better than anyone else set a whole new standard generating profits by inventing stars. Putting kids in television and movies is only the beginning of their giant cash machine. Let&#8217;s not forget about the live concerts and world wide merchandising to follow that exists around every corner in every isle of each and every store. These companies are interested in profit, but at what cost? When my wife and I review most of the TV programming, we witness a bunch of seemingly perfect individuals. Hair, make-up, clothing, even the homes portrayed in the shows are larger than life. So where does that leave our children? We feel that it only causes them to feel cheated and deprived.</p>
<p>Parent/ Troop Leaders &#8211; We are the proud parents of one marvelous daughter. We had hoped to more than one child but a higher power prevented that from happening. With that we&#8217;ve entertained the notion of either adopting or volunteering to help young people. Why? Because we have much to share. In 2003 we adopted an abandoned Girl Scout Brownie Troop. Now going on our eight year, we are still together and four are now pursuing their Girl Scout Gold Award, the highest achievement in Girl Scouting. (But that&#8217;s a whole other story). The long and the short of it is, &#8220;We are interested in helping to empower young people with confidence, self esteem and to teach them that they&#8217;re extraordinary just the way they are. When they&#8217;re with us we don&#8217;t care about hair, make-up or brand named clothing, only them as a person, as an individual person.</p>
<p>Why do they do it? &#8211; Some folks we know wonder how or even why we make the time to give so much of ourselves to other people. I guess you could say it&#8217;s a calling of sorts. One thing that also bears mentioning here is this; When I was very young, I was interested in hobbies. Two of our neighbors allowed me to spend countless hours in their own respective workshops teaching me about all of the various materials and how to use the machines safely. Always appreciative, I felt absolutely indebted to them 24 p/day. After several months had passed I made a similar statement to both men respectively, &#8220;I don&#8217;t know how I&#8217;ll ever be able to pay you back for all you&#8217;ve done.&#8221; Their response was virtually identical, &#8220;Son, when you grow up, you go out and help teach young people as well. If you do that, then we&#8217;re square&#8221;, Okay?&#8221; Of course I agreed to the arrangement wholeheartedly. (Interestingly, neither one of these men knew the other).</p>
<p>Nowadays we don&#8217;t expect anything in return for our volunteer efforts. We always provide environments where kids feel safe, feel good about themselves and hopefully, become success stories in their own futures. Just the same, we are supporters of anyone else who believes in these same kinds of philosophies. With that a particular name comes to mind right away, &#8220;Molly Barker&#8221;.</p>
<p>Our one and only daughter participated in Girl&#8217;s on the Run (G.O.T.R.). Beginning in my daughter&#8217;s 3rd grade year, she joined Girls on the Run. G.O.T.R. is an after school program which takes place a couple of days p/week in the elementary school gym for the most part. <a href="http://www.girlsontherun.org/default.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.girlsontherun.org/default.html</a> At the time, my wife and I were simply happy that our daughter was getting a little extra exercise and enjoying yet another self-esteem building program. As far as we&#8217;re concerned, young people can never get too much positive influence in our world full of make believe.</p>
<p>Several weeks later a local mom later gifted me with Molly Barker&#8217;s first book entitled, &#8220;Girls on Track&#8221;. Link: <a href="http://www.girlsontherun.org/mollybarker_sbooks.html#track" rel="nofollow">http://www.girlsontherun.org/mollybarker_sbooks.html#track</a>  Admittedly I am a sensitive person to begin with, so it came as no surprise that many of the stories in Molly&#8217;s book brought me to tears. Furthermore, the people that know me well say, &#8220;If you liked the book Greg, you MUST go see Molly Barker live.&#8221; Later we discovered just how right they were.</p>
<p>My wife and I enjoyed the opportunity to meet Molly Barker for the first time in 2006. The meeting was brief with not much more that a handshake and picture pose during a 5K event. Nevertheless, we recognized a solid connection when looking into in Molly&#8217;s eyes that made us realize that we&#8217;re both on the very same page. In the days to follow I became deeply inspired to make a fully edited movie about my daughter&#8217;s Girls on the Run experience. Later we mailed a copy to Molly and she too was deeply moved. The next year I made a second movie about the program, but this time not just for my daughter&#8217;s collection, but all of the team&#8217;s families as well. The DVD was very well received. Anymore, in communicating with Molly and her Girls on the Run program, we always refer to our family as being, &#8220;3 of her biggest fans&#8221;.</p>
<p> &#8220;Girls on the Run is so much fun!&#8221; Just ask my daughter and she&#8217;ll tell you ALL about it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monks in Caves or Saints in Society? by daviddstoker</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/monks-in-caves-or-saints-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>daviddstoker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 21:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/monks-in-caves-or-saints-in-society/#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Thanks for coming by Konrei- you are absolutely right in terms of this not being a great description of Zen and I feel completely inadequate to do the topic justice. So I will spend some time searching around about it.  Thanks again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for coming by Konrei- you are absolutely right in terms of this not being a great description of Zen and I feel completely inadequate to do the topic justice. So I will spend some time searching around about it.  Thanks again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monks in Caves or Saints in Society? by Konrei</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/monks-in-caves-or-saints-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-203</link>
		<dc:creator>Konrei</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/monks-in-caves-or-saints-in-society/#comment-203</guid>
		<description>This is an interesting blog entry, though you don&#039;t really address &quot;Zen&quot; as such. Cambodian Theravada Buddhism is quite different from Zen. As a matter of fact, Zen is very different from most other forms of Buddhism (and there are scores of sects). Zen focuses heavily, but not exclusively, on sitting meditation and mindful awareness as expressed in the Bodhisattva Precepts. I can&#039;t go into a deep discussion of the Precepts here, but there is a wealth of material on the net. I agree though---Zen is more a spiritual practice than a religion as Westerners understand religion to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an interesting blog entry, though you don&#8217;t really address &#8220;Zen&#8221; as such. Cambodian Theravada Buddhism is quite different from Zen. As a matter of fact, Zen is very different from most other forms of Buddhism (and there are scores of sects). Zen focuses heavily, but not exclusively, on sitting meditation and mindful awareness as expressed in the Bodhisattva Precepts. I can&#8217;t go into a deep discussion of the Precepts here, but there is a wealth of material on the net. I agree though&#8212;Zen is more a spiritual practice than a religion as Westerners understand religion to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why are there so many religions? by Bryan</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/why-are-there-so-many-religions/comment-page-1/#comment-202</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/?p=11#comment-202</guid>
		<description>You pose a very good question--regarding the possibility that God could intervene again.  Do we believe in a loving God?  Do we believe that we need God?  Do we believe in a God that is smart enough to answer our questions?  My heartfelt answer to these three quesitons is a definite yes.  If so, and if His purpose is to bring about the happiness and exaltation of His children(that is what the scriptures teach), then why would He set up the perfect atmosphere to bring the truth back (the religious freedom we have today that is unparalleled in world history), enable global communication so that any important message could go to all the world, and aid the world in becoming more literate than ever before in its history, and then leave the world in confusion?  In essence, why would He do all that and not bring the fulness of the truth to a clearly confused world?  God is not the author of confusion.  He is a Being of light and knowledge--which He wants to share with His children.

The only logical and correct conlusion is that He has brought back answers that were lost through the Dark Ages in which learning was terribly suppresed.  God prepared the world for a restoration of truth.  Since He is preparing the world for the Second Coming of the Savior (at which time He will gather in the faithful, so there must be faithful people to gather in), He clearly has a plan for letting His children actually know what is true.  The idea that we can&#039;t actually know something, but must blindly believe, is an old trick of the devil and is false.  We CAN know!  I believe in a God who reveals truth if we ask--and He only stops revealing truth when we refuse to learn more.  So, the truth is out there and God wants us to find it.  How then can we know what the truth is when so many claim to have it?

If you have a chance to talk to a couple of LDS missionaries, they would happy to share with you how God has made it possible for anyone who desires to know to know for certain what is true in this world.  I advise all to listen to the missionaries with an open heart and read from the Book of Mormon they give you.  They will make a unique claim--you don&#039;t have to believe it because that&#039;s what you&#039;re told--believe it because God answers your prayers and tells you so.  Put their promise and mine to the test: if you ask God sincerely He will tell you that it is true!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pose a very good question&#8211;regarding the possibility that God could intervene again.  Do we believe in a loving God?  Do we believe that we need God?  Do we believe in a God that is smart enough to answer our questions?  My heartfelt answer to these three quesitons is a definite yes.  If so, and if His purpose is to bring about the happiness and exaltation of His children(that is what the scriptures teach), then why would He set up the perfect atmosphere to bring the truth back (the religious freedom we have today that is unparalleled in world history), enable global communication so that any important message could go to all the world, and aid the world in becoming more literate than ever before in its history, and then leave the world in confusion?  In essence, why would He do all that and not bring the fulness of the truth to a clearly confused world?  God is not the author of confusion.  He is a Being of light and knowledge&#8211;which He wants to share with His children.</p>
<p>The only logical and correct conlusion is that He has brought back answers that were lost through the Dark Ages in which learning was terribly suppresed.  God prepared the world for a restoration of truth.  Since He is preparing the world for the Second Coming of the Savior (at which time He will gather in the faithful, so there must be faithful people to gather in), He clearly has a plan for letting His children actually know what is true.  The idea that we can&#8217;t actually know something, but must blindly believe, is an old trick of the devil and is false.  We CAN know!  I believe in a God who reveals truth if we ask&#8211;and He only stops revealing truth when we refuse to learn more.  So, the truth is out there and God wants us to find it.  How then can we know what the truth is when so many claim to have it?</p>
<p>If you have a chance to talk to a couple of LDS missionaries, they would happy to share with you how God has made it possible for anyone who desires to know to know for certain what is true in this world.  I advise all to listen to the missionaries with an open heart and read from the Book of Mormon they give you.  They will make a unique claim&#8211;you don&#8217;t have to believe it because that&#8217;s what you&#8217;re told&#8211;believe it because God answers your prayers and tells you so.  Put their promise and mine to the test: if you ask God sincerely He will tell you that it is true!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Monks in Caves or Saints in Society? by Sampuran Das</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/monks-in-caves-or-saints-in-society/comment-page-1/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>Sampuran Das</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 10:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/monks-in-caves-or-saints-in-society/#comment-200</guid>
		<description>Buddha Dharma is a philosophy seeking Religion. The original teachings of Buddha is stated in Tripitaka. Abhidharma ( Beyond Religion ) - is 3rd Section of Tripitaka, is the fundamental philosophy of Dependent Origination – (Pratitya-samutpada).All beings and phenomena are caused to exist by other beings and phenomena. In Buddhism, there is no teaching of a First Cause, Buddha emphasized understanding the nature of things as-they-are over speculation of what might have happened in the past or what might happen in the future. Buddha remained silent on the question of &quot;creator god&quot;.“ Secondly, there is no permanent &quot;self&quot;. What we think of as our self, our personality and ego, are temporary creations of the “skandhas” -- form, sensation, perception, mental formation and consciousness, which gives rise to false notion of  permanent &quot;you&quot; as an separate entity and distinct from everything else/universe.

In India at the time of Buddha there were other competing Religious Philosophy (Vedantic Hinduism)-Sankya Philosphy (Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra) It is also argued that the existence of God cannot be proved and hence cannot be admitted to exist and an unchanging Ishvara/God as the cause cannot be the source of a changing world as the effect. 

(Brhadaranyaka Upanishad) is another Vedanta Text that precede Buddism states &quot;The Divine is not this and it is not that&quot; ( In Sanskrit &quot;Neti-Neti&quot;). Divine is not real as we are real, nor is it unreal. The divine is not living in the sense humans live, nor is it dead. The Divine is not compassionate as we use the term, nor is it uncompassionate. And so on. We can never truly define God in words. All we can say, in effect, is that &quot;It isn&#039;t this, but also, it isn&#039;t that either&quot;. In the end, the student must transcend words to understand the nature of the Divine.

Vaisheshika Sect Buddhist Monk Dharmakīrti, teached - atomism philosophy about reality as being composed of atomic entities that are momentary flashes of light or energy. Buddhists denied the existence of substantial matter altogether. Movement consists for them of moments, it is a staccato movement, momentary flashes of a stream of energy... &quot;Everything is evanescent&quot;

Buddhism in India was anhilated by Islamic Invasion. 
Currently, Mahayana School of Buddism founded by Monk Nagarjuna is practiced in East Asia- Japan/China etc. And Theravada Buddism is practiced in SE Asia- Sri Lanka is the oldest &amp; closest to original Buddhism, since the time Emperor Ashoka  in 270 BC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buddha Dharma is a philosophy seeking Religion. The original teachings of Buddha is stated in Tripitaka. Abhidharma ( Beyond Religion ) &#8211; is 3rd Section of Tripitaka, is the fundamental philosophy of Dependent Origination – (Pratitya-samutpada).All beings and phenomena are caused to exist by other beings and phenomena. In Buddhism, there is no teaching of a First Cause, Buddha emphasized understanding the nature of things as-they-are over speculation of what might have happened in the past or what might happen in the future. Buddha remained silent on the question of &#8220;creator god&#8221;.“ Secondly, there is no permanent &#8220;self&#8221;. What we think of as our self, our personality and ego, are temporary creations of the “skandhas” &#8212; form, sensation, perception, mental formation and consciousness, which gives rise to false notion of  permanent &#8220;you&#8221; as an separate entity and distinct from everything else/universe.</p>
<p>In India at the time of Buddha there were other competing Religious Philosophy (Vedantic Hinduism)-Sankya Philosphy (Sāṁkhyapravacana Sūtra) It is also argued that the existence of God cannot be proved and hence cannot be admitted to exist and an unchanging Ishvara/God as the cause cannot be the source of a changing world as the effect. </p>
<p>(Brhadaranyaka Upanishad) is another Vedanta Text that precede Buddism states &#8220;The Divine is not this and it is not that&#8221; ( In Sanskrit &#8220;Neti-Neti&#8221;). Divine is not real as we are real, nor is it unreal. The divine is not living in the sense humans live, nor is it dead. The Divine is not compassionate as we use the term, nor is it uncompassionate. And so on. We can never truly define God in words. All we can say, in effect, is that &#8220;It isn&#8217;t this, but also, it isn&#8217;t that either&#8221;. In the end, the student must transcend words to understand the nature of the Divine.</p>
<p>Vaisheshika Sect Buddhist Monk Dharmakīrti, teached &#8211; atomism philosophy about reality as being composed of atomic entities that are momentary flashes of light or energy. Buddhists denied the existence of substantial matter altogether. Movement consists for them of moments, it is a staccato movement, momentary flashes of a stream of energy&#8230; &#8220;Everything is evanescent&#8221;</p>
<p>Buddhism in India was anhilated by Islamic Invasion.<br />
Currently, Mahayana School of Buddism founded by Monk Nagarjuna is practiced in East Asia- Japan/China etc. And Theravada Buddism is practiced in SE Asia- Sri Lanka is the oldest &amp; closest to original Buddhism, since the time Emperor Ashoka  in 270 BC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Beautiful photo exhibition depicting the life of Christ by Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/beautiful-photo-exhibition-depicting-the-life-of-christ/comment-page-1/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 17:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/?p=77#comment-198</guid>
		<description>a beautiful video. thanks for sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a beautiful video. thanks for sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Planet Earth Series should be added to Mormon Endowment by Dawn</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/planet-earth-series-should-be-added-to-mormon-endowment/comment-page-1/#comment-197</link>
		<dc:creator>Dawn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 14:25:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/planet-earth-series-should-be-added-to-mormon-endowment/#comment-197</guid>
		<description>We have to learn dominion. As with everything else we first observe and in observing learn. That alone should take a lifetime. The least we can do is not interfere with already established creations - before we have observed and learned about them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have to learn dominion. As with everything else we first observe and in observing learn. That alone should take a lifetime. The least we can do is not interfere with already established creations &#8211; before we have observed and learned about them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contempories: Buddha and Enos of the Book of Mormon by Ganzo</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/contempories-buddha-and-enos-of-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Ganzo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 06:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/contempories-buddha-and-enos-of-the-book-of-mormon/#comment-196</guid>
		<description>Buddha , Jesus, Allah, Also before times many god are true Gods. 

You can know in the love and real knowledge. This is not difficult if you got into pure heart and pure mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buddha , Jesus, Allah, Also before times many god are true Gods. </p>
<p>You can know in the love and real knowledge. This is not difficult if you got into pure heart and pure mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Contempories: Buddha and Enos of the Book of Mormon by Julio</title>
		<link>http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/contempories-buddha-and-enos-of-the-book-of-mormon/comment-page-1/#comment-195</link>
		<dc:creator>Julio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 20:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thoughtsofaseeker.net/contempories-buddha-and-enos-of-the-book-of-mormon/#comment-195</guid>
		<description>Theodore, nobody has ever said Buddha is God or a god. Not even Jesus and Allah are considered gods! The discussion is about the guideline of those religions. Read with more attention, in order to understand the core of the discussion, and not expressing misleading opinions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Theodore, nobody has ever said Buddha is God or a god. Not even Jesus and Allah are considered gods! The discussion is about the guideline of those religions. Read with more attention, in order to understand the core of the discussion, and not expressing misleading opinions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

